top of page

Ethical Dilemma!


A 65-year-old man who was diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis three years ago presented to the emergency department for dyspraxia. While in the emergency department he wrote on a whiteboard “not ready to die”. Therefore, he was promptly sedated, intubated, and mechanically ventilated. He was admitted to the intensive care unit and workup has revealed respiratory failure is due to his ALS and he will not wean from the ventilator. Off sedation, he follows commands and responds appropriately.

During his visit three months ago the patient had a significant bulbar weakness with dysarthria and dysphasia and there was a decline in the pulmonary function test to a forced vital capacity of 30%. After discussion with his primary neurologist and his wife who is the power of attorney he decided against tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation. A DNR order was signed at that time. Now tracheostomy is indicated for definitive management of his respiratory failure, what would be the appropriate action?




31 views2 comments

Recent Posts

See All

2 Comments


ekseibi
ekseibi
Aug 01, 2021

Given that he is indicated this visit that he’s not ready to die, the right action was done with intubation. Off sedation now he is responding abs following commands, so he should take the decision regarding tracheostomy. Every attempt should be taken to wean off invasive respiratory support.

Like
Mazen Kherallah
Mazen Kherallah
Aug 01, 2021
Replying to

I agree, the patient can change his mind in DNR despite his previous advanced directive as long as he is competent to make decisions

Like
bottom of page