CRITICAL CARE TRIALS
Stay ahead of the curve with exciting new clinical trials from the critical care field presented in vivid, visual abstract format. Gain comprehensive and insightful perspectives as each critical development is delivered to you.
CHEST Trial
Nov 15, 2012
Hydroxyethyl Starch or Saline for Fluid Resuscitation in Intensive Care.
In a multicenter RCT of 7000 critically ill patients, resuscitation with 6% HES (130/0.4) did not significantly reduce 90-day mortality compared to saline (18% vs. 17%; P = 0.26). HES increased the need for renal replacement therapy (7.0% vs. 5.8%; P = 0.04, NNH = 83) and acute kidney injury (38.0% vs. 34.6%; P = 0.005) and was associated with more adverse events, including pruritus and rash. These findings suggest HES should not be used for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.
6S Trial
Jul 12, 2012
Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's Acetate in Severe Sepsis.
In a multicenter RCT of 804 patients with severe sepsis, fluid resuscitation with 6% HES (130/0.42) significantly increased the composite outcome of 90-day mortality or dependence on dialysis compared to Ringer's acetate (51% vs. 43%; P = 0.03, NNH = 13). HES also increased the need for renal replacement therapy (22% vs. 16%; P = 0.04, NNH = 17). These findings strongly discourage the use of HES for resuscitation in septic ICU patients.
EDEN Trial
Feb 29, 2012
Initial Trophic vs Full Enteral Feeding in Patients With Acute Lung Injury.
This multicenter, open-label RCT compared trophic enteral feeding (20 kcal/h) with full enteral feeding (25–30 kcal/kg/day) over 6 days in 1000 mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂ <300). Ventilator-free days (14.9 vs. 15, p=0.89), 60-day mortality (23.2% vs. 22.2%, p=0.77), and infectious complications were similar. Trophic feeding reduced gastrointestinal intolerance (gastric residuals 2.2% vs. 4.9%, p<0.001). Findings support initiating early enteral feeding with escalation as tolerated.
ACURASYS Trial
Sep 16, 2010
Neuromuscular Blockers in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
This multicenter, double-blinded RCT evaluated early neuromuscular blockade with cisatracurium in 340 patients with moderate to severe ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂ <150). Adjusted 90-day mortality was lower in the cisatracurium group (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48–0.98, p=0.04), though crude mortality was not significantly different (31.6% vs. 40.7%, p=0.08). Subgroup analysis suggested benefits in patients with PaO₂/FiO₂ <120 (30.8% vs. 44.6%, p=0.04). Limitations include reduced statistical power. Findings support early neuromuscular blockade in severe ARDS.
SOAP-II Trial
Mar 4, 2010
Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock.
In a multicenter RCT of 1679 patients with shock, dopamine did not significantly reduce 28-day mortality compared to norepinephrine (52.5% vs. 48.5%; P = 0.10). Dopamine caused more arrhythmias (24.1% vs. 12.4%; P < 0.001) and was associated with higher mortality in cardiogenic shock (subgroup P = 0.03). Norepinephrine was more effective in maintaining target blood pressure. Findings support norepinephrine as the preferred first-line vasopressor for all shock types.
Intensity of RRT in Critically Ill Patients
Oct 22, 2009
Intensity of Continuous Renal-Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients
In a multicenter RCT of 1508 critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, higher-intensity dialysis (40 ml/kg/hour) did not improve 90-day mortality compared to lower-intensity dialysis (25 ml/kg/hour) (44.7% in both groups; P = 0.99). Need for RRT at 90 days and subgroup outcomes, including severe sepsis, were similar. Hypophosphatemia was more common with high-intensity therapy. These findings do not support routine use of higher-intensity renal replacement therapy.
NICE SUGAR
Mar 26, 2009
Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients.
In a multicenter RCT of 6104 ICU patients, intensive glucose control (81–108 mg/dL) increased 90-day mortality compared to conventional control (<180 mg/dL) (27.5% vs. 24.9%; P = 0.02) and significantly raised the risk of severe hypoglycemia (6.8% vs. 0.5%; P < 0.001). Secondary outcomes, including ICU/hospital length of stay and organ support days, were similar. Findings support targeting blood glucose <180 mg/dL in critically ill patients to avoid harm associated with intensive glucose control.
VASST Trial
Feb 28, 2008
Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine Infusion in Patients with Septic Shock.
In a multicenter RCT of 778 patients with septic shock, low-dose vasopressin did not significantly reduce 28-day mortality compared to norepinephrine (35.4% vs. 39.3%; P = 0.26). Subgroup analysis suggested potential benefit in less severe septic shock but not in severe cases. Vasopressin showed no differences in adverse events, organ dysfunction-free days, or renal replacement therapy needs. These findings support vasopressin as a catecholamine-sparing agent rather than a mortality-reducing therapy.
CORTICUS Trial
Jan 10, 2008
Hydrocortisone Therapy for Patients with Septic Shock.
In a multicenter RCT of 499 patients with septic shock, hydrocortisone did not improve 28-day mortality compared to placebo (34.3% vs. 31.5%; P = 0.51), regardless of response to a corticotropin test. However, hydrocortisone significantly hastened shock reversal (3.3 vs. 6.9 days; P < 0.001). Hydrocortisone was associated with increased hyperglycemia (85% vs. 72%) and superinfections (33% vs. 26%). These findings suggest hydrocortisone may benefit select patients but do not support routine corticotropin testing.
EPO-3
Sep 6, 2007
Efficacy and Safety of Epoetin Alfa in Critically Ill Patients.
In a multicenter RCT of 1460 critically ill patients, epoetin alfa did not significantly reduce RBC transfusion rates (46% vs. 48.3%; P = 0.34) or overall 29-day mortality (8.5% vs. 11.4%; HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.56–1.10). Hemoglobin levels were higher with epoetin alfa (1.6 g/dL vs. 1.2 g/dL; P < 0.001), but thrombotic events increased (16.5% vs. 11.5%; P = 0.008). In trauma patients, 29-day mortality improved (3.5% vs. 6.6%; NNT = 32). Routine use is not recommended; further research is needed in trauma patients.
MEDURI ARDS 2007
Apr 9, 2007
Methylprednisolone Infusion in Early Severe ARDS
This randomized, double-blind trial investigated low-dose extended methylprednisolone infusion versus placebo in 91 patients with early severe ARDS (<72 h). Methylprednisolone significantly improved lung function, with more patients achieving a 1-point reduction in lung injury score (69.8% vs. 35.7%, p=0.002) and successful extubation by day 7 (54.0% vs. 25.0%, p=0.01). Secondary outcomes favored treatment, including reduced ICU mortality (20.6% vs. 42.9%, p=0.03), shorter ICU stays (7 vs. 14.5 days, p=0.007), and lower infection rates (15.9% vs. 28.6%, p=0.0002). Findings suggest potential benefits of methylprednisolone in early severe ARDS, warranting larger trials for confirmation.
FACTT Trial
Jun 15, 2006
Comparison of Two Fluid-Management Strategies in Acute Lung Injury.
In a multicenter RCT of 1000 patients with ALI/ARDS, a conservative fluid strategy did not significantly reduce 60-day mortality compared to a liberal strategy (25.5% vs. 28.4%; P = 0.30). However, it improved oxygenation index, lung injury scores, ventilator-free days (14.6 vs. 12.1; P < 0.001), and ICU-free days (13.4 vs. 11.2; P < 0.001). Conservative fluid management did not increase shock or dialysis use, supporting its use to enhance lung recovery and reduce ICU dependency in ALI/ARDS patients.













